nanog mailing list archives
Re: /24s run amuck
From: Timothy Brown <tim () tux org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:49:43 -0500
I stand corrected. The following page comparing Cisco and Imagestream is quite interesting. http://www.imagestream.com/Cisco_Comparison.htmlHmm -- does anyone here have one? How good a job did they do locking down Linux?
I have one. Two, actually. They have user-friendlied it up - you log in and you get a not-that-fancy menu interface. The router is based on gated, not zebra/quagga. It works alright, but there are a number of gaping inconsistencies with it. It's not necessarily that I have a problem with PC routers, it's that their implementation leaves some to be desired. For further information, inquiries to me off-list. Tim
Current thread:
- Re: /24s run amuck, (continued)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Sean M . Doran (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Michael . Dillon (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Paul (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Michael . Dillon (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck David Barak (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Timothy Brown (Jan 14)
- imagestream vs. Cisco Alex Yuriev (Jan 14)
- Re: imagestream vs. Cisco Frank Louwers (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck jlewis (Jan 14)
- PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) james (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) jlewis (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Joe Abley (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Alexei Roudnev (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) james (Jan 14)
- Message not available
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) james (Jan 14)