Re: Upcoming change to SOA values in .com and .net zones

["Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>]

> YYYYMMDDnnn exceeds 32 bits for contemporary values of YYYY, so that's 
> not a viable alternative. YYMMDDnnn would work, but has Y2K-ignorant 
> connotations (not that that's particular relevant, post Y2K). Using a 

Hmm bearing in mind how the calculation is done YYMMDDnnnn (or nnn) wouldnt be a
problem..  going from 9912319999 to 0001010000 is considered to be an increase
isnt it? [actually it wraps at 2^31 =~ 4e10]

Steve