nanog mailing list archives
Re: Smallest Transit MTU
From: Tony Rall <trall () almaden ibm com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 13:33:44 -0800
On Wednesday, 2004-12-29 at 13:43 EST, Joe Abley <jabley () isc org> wrote:
However, there are a growing throng of broadband users who have PPTP or other encaps between them and the world,
Encapsulated traffic (vpns, etc.) is indeed what I see as the largest contributor to connectivity problems for large packets.
and who are able to get along just fine by reducing the advertised MSS in their TCP stack.
But that only affects tcp traffic - it does nothing to help other protocols. In other words, it's a fairly lame circumvention that happens to do the job for most usage (but assuming it solves the problem often results in seemingly inexplicable failures when other protocols happen to be used). The better solution is to ensure that PMTUD works correctly for your network, and get on the case of any correspondent or provider for which it doesn't. Tony Rall
Current thread:
- Smallest Transit MTU Jerry Pasker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Fred Baker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Jerry Pasker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Fred Baker (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Tony Rall (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Daniel Hagerty (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Alex Bligh (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Tony Rall (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Joe Abley (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 29)
- Re: Smallest Transit MTU Edward B. Dreger (Dec 29)