nanog mailing list archives
Re: using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes
From: Bruce Pinsky <bep () whack org>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:30:46 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Francis wrote: | | It probably depends more on pps than bandwidth. | At a prior job, I used FreeBSD 4.x machines to capture over 400,000 pps, | I think, on gigabit links. | You need a nic that is supported with one of the device polling drivers | to keep CPU manageable. (Intel, not yet broadcom.) | | FreeBSD far surpassed Solaris in packet capture performance. | | Linux 2.6 machines may do OK, using NAPI - but I've no experience with | that. | Eric Weigle and Wu-Chen Feng presented a paper at PAM2002 entitled "TICKETing High-Speed Traffic with Commodity Hardware and Software" where they showed collecting traffic at greater than 600Mbps and to 1Gbps in some configurations. See http://public.lanl.gov/radiant/pubs.html#TICKET - -- ========= bep -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBsJS1E1XcgMgrtyYRAsHiAKCRHj6cIEuxut3vcNMHZf+RIA3/QACg2txD 4fEavciBOTN4TwuigotN14c= =VEBQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes todd romero (Dec 03)
- Re: using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes Steve Francis (Dec 03)
- Re: using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes Bruce Pinsky (Dec 03)
- Re: using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 03)
- Re: using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes Alexei Roudnev (Dec 07)
- Re: using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes John Kinsella (Dec 03)
- Re: using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes JP Velders (Dec 03)
- Re: using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes Peter John Hill (Dec 03)
- Re: using sniffer on high-bandwidth pipes Steve Francis (Dec 03)