nanog mailing list archives
Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection
From: Patrick W Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:46:00 -0400
On Aug 17, 2004, at 12:31 AM, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
4. Anycast is the most scalable and standard solution for dispersed DNS server farm, while layer-4 switch could deal could do with centralized server farm;its not a standard.<ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc1546.txt>, aka _Host Anycasting Service_ Looks pretty standard to me.Nope. Its -INFORMATIONAL- e.g. Not a Standard.
Ahhh, I see.
Not to mention being used in production on several major networks for over half a decade (read: "forever") on the Internet is pretty well tested technology.true enough. but not "the most scaleable and standard solution"
Yeah, well, neither is HTTP for that matter. But most people would consider both of them pretty standard(ized?).
I'm perfectly happy for someone to quote even an _informational_ RFC as a "standard". Guess I'm weird.
Sorry if everyone thinks differently. -- TTFN, patrickP.S. That would be "i.e.". If you are going to argue semantic points, you should get your grammar right. =)
Current thread:
- Domain Name System protection Joe Shen (Aug 15)
- Re: Domain Name System protection Bill Woodcock (Aug 15)
- Re: Domain Name System protection Joe Abley (Aug 16)
- Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection Joe Shen (Aug 16)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection Joe Abley (Aug 17)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection Michael . Dillon (Aug 17)
- Re: Domain Name System protection Bill Woodcock (Aug 15)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection vijay gill (Aug 17)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection sthaug (Aug 17)
- Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection Jeff Aitken (Aug 17)
- filtering 1918 (was Re: Summary with...: Domain Name System ...) Paul Vixie (Aug 18)
- Re: filtering 1918 (was Re: Summary with...: Domain Name System ...) Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 18)
- Re: filtering 1918 (was Re: Summary with...: Domain Name System ...) David A. Ulevitch (Aug 18)
- Re: filtering 1918 (was Re: Summary with...: Domain Name System ...) Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 18)
- Re: filtering 1918 (was Re: Summary with...: Domain Name System ...) Jared Mauch (Aug 18)