RE: Spam with no purpose?

[Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>]

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Scott Call wrote:

: Kinda of makes you wonder if AP and the like could go after spammers
: habeaus style on copyright infringement.  Since the spam is a source of
: revenue, it could be construed as criminal copyright infringement as well
: as civil....

AP will face the same problem as Habeas:  tracing the spam backwards through
the open proxies and China hosting to get information about the real source.

RFG ran a honeypot open proxy network that collected information about
allegedly "real" proxy-rape spam sources, but he was DDoS'd to death by such
people, and then gave up on the effort [publicly?  who knows?].

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com>