nanog mailing list archives
RE: Spam with no purpose?
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 13:16:52 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Michel Py wrote: : And as I said earlier, expect the "bunch of dictionary words" to mutate : into a more sophisticated animal that includes correct grammar. This has already happened; there is some well known spam that consists of HTML "content" or an image-based ad, with snippets of recent AP newswire stories in the plaintext body section. -- -- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com>
Current thread:
- Re: Spam with no purpose?, (continued)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Jonathan Nichols (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Gregory Hicks (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 02)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Michael . Dillon (Apr 01)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 01)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 04)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Todd Vierling (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Scott Call (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Todd Vierling (Apr 05)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Chris Adams (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Scott Call (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Apr 05)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 05)