nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Sean Donelan wrote:
Should anonymous use of the Internet be eliminated so all forms of abuse can be tracked and dealt with?
As long as there are tier1's who allow abuse as long as the checks dont bounce, this will have zero effect. exodus for example had a hands off policy, dont do a single thing until law enforcement arrives with a search warrant. looks like yahoo has adopted a similar policy. -Dan
Current thread:
- Lazy network operators Chris Boyd (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Richard Cox (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Eric A. Hall (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators jlewis (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Sean Donelan (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Dan Hollis (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Jeff Workman (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Scott Call (Apr 10)
- TTY phone fraud and abuse Sean Donelan (Apr 10)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Scott Call (Apr 10)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Sean Donelan (Apr 11)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 11)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 11)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 11)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Stephen Sprunk (Apr 11)
- Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Sean Donelan (Apr 10)