nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign
From: George William Herbert <gherbert () retro com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:22:57 -0700
Michael Dillon wrote:
Complaining on this mailing list achieves very little but [...]
It did one useful thing; it gave a wide number of operators across the ISP and infrastructure industries a chance to see what was happening and put in their two cents. My initial impression was that the wildcard was amazingly bad for a number of reasons, but based on my own impression alone I am unlikely to launch complaints to a wide range of regulators and congresspeople. It is now quite clear that nobody in the industry has seen fit to respond to the Verisign actions as anything defensible at the technical or policy levels. So my opinion goes from being my two cents to a consensus; and I will act in those external arenas based on what I see as a sufficiently wide consensus... -george william herbert gherbert () retro com
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign, (continued)
- Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign David Lesher (Sep 18)
- Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Chris Adams (Sep 18)
- Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Dominic J. Eidson (Sep 18)
- Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Marc MERLIN (Sep 18)
- Fw: Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Jerry Eyers (Sep 18)
- Re: Fw: Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Miles Fidelman (Sep 18)
- Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign John Neiberger (Sep 18)
- RE: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Matthew Zito (Sep 18)
- RE: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Gerald (Sep 18)
- Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)
- RE: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Matthew Zito (Sep 18)
- Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign George William Herbert (Sep 18)
- Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign David Lesher (Sep 21)