Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down

[Mike Tancsa <mike () sentex net>]

At 01:49 PM 29/09/2003, Jared Mauch wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:11:08PM -0400, Dan Armstrong wrote:
> > Isn't that collateral damage issue enough to have angered hundreds of ISPs
> > & end users to the point of not necessarily organizing a DDoS, but ignoring
> > it?  I think it is far _more_ likely that the DDoS came from the innocent
> > victims fighting back rather than the spammers.
>
>         Presently I beg to differ. (I do encourage you to prove me wrong :)

Especially in the case of SPAMHAUS, they were no XRBL.  What networks were 
really listed as collateral damage ?  I dont see how willtel was an 
innocent bystander either in the previous case.

        ---Mike