nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign Responds
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dave Stewart wrote:
Courts are likely to support the position that Verisign has control of .net and .com and can do pretty much anything they want with it.
ISC has made root-delegation-only the default behaviour in the new bind, how about drafting up an RFC making it an absolute default requirement for all DNS? -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
Current thread:
- Verisign Responds Leo Bicknell (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Mike Tancsa (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Haesu (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dave Stewart (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Sep 22)
- RE: Verisign Responds Jeroen Massar (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Mike Tancsa (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Matthew Richardson (Sep 23)