nanog mailing list archives
Verisign Responds
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:23:07 -0400
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/lewis-to-twomey-21sep03.htm I quote: ] As to your call for us to suspend the service, I would respectfully ] suggest that it would be premature to decide on any course of action ] until we first have had an opportunity to collect and review the ] available data. One would think it would be equally premature to roll out the service without first asking the appropriate people for their opinion first, starting with ICANN. Looks like the lawsuits are going to be the ones to settle this dispute...anyone think there's a chance of ICANN pulling .COM and .NET from Verisign due to breach of contract? I think it's highly unlikely. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Verisign Responds Leo Bicknell (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Mike Tancsa (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Haesu (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dave Stewart (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds bmanning (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign Responds Mike Tancsa (Sep 22)