![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
RE: Site Finder
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:35:30 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Owen DeLong wrote:
--On Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:57 -0600 Michael Loftis <mloftis () wgops com> wrote:I have a good one, when was the last tiema telco asked any of us, or anyone for that matter, how to handle an NPA-NXX assignment? or LERG?This isn't necessarily a great analogy for this situation. It is likely Verisign thinks of themselves as the phone company in this case and us as the consumers that don't know.
Besides, the FCC and the phone companies frequently ask the public for comment concerning the North American Numbering Plan administration. They also act and change based on those comments. Unlike the NSI situation, the FCC has changed NANP administrators several times, and generally issues a 1 year contract with an option to renew for successive years. Its also clear the NANPA doesn't "own" the north american numbering plan or the databases used to administer it.
Current thread:
- Re: Site Finder, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Site Finder Robert Boyle (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Jared Mauch (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Will Yardley (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Dan Lockwood (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Jack Bates (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Michael Loftis (Oct 18)
- (on-topic) / RE: Site Finder Bryan Bradsby (Oct 18)
- Re: (on-topic) / RE: Site Finder Michael Loftis (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Sean Donelan (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Owen DeLong (Oct 18)