nanog mailing list archives
RE: Site Finder
From: "Geo." <georger () getinfo net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:34:01 -0400
Verisign is trying to move this argument into a question of what best
serves the end-user.<< This doesn't matter, their point should be moot. Verisign is charged with managing the .com and .net domains for the public. They DO NOT OWN those domains so they are not allowed to use them for their own greedy purposes. An example, some outfit gets charged with managing a government housing development, so they decide to use the parking lot to hold their own private flee market. It's not their property and they have no right to do this. Same goes for whoever gets to manage .net and .com. It's not about what's best for anyone, it's about improper use of public property for personal gain. Geo.
Current thread:
- Site Finder Ray Bellis (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Kee Hinckley (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Jason Slagle (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Geo. (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder E.B. Dreger (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Wayne E. Bouchard (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Michael Moscovitch (Oct 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Site Finder Robert Boyle (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Michael Moscovitch (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Jared Mauch (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Will Yardley (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Kee Hinckley (Oct 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Site Finder Dan Lockwood (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Jack Bates (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Michael Loftis (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Owen DeLong (Oct 18)