RE: Extreme BlackDiamond

["Shazad - eServers" <shazad () eservers biz>]

> > > From here, shazad () eservers biz looks like a relatively small colo 
> > > customer.    

Yes we are relatively small, we colocate around 1500 servers in our own
suite.

> > > > What's he looking at big switches for?
Quite frankly I can look for what I want, we are expanding into Europe and
came here for some advice.. Do we have any problems here?

> > > More importantly, does anyone care?
Does anybody care? Dammm GOOOD JOB that you are a small minority in this
world.


If you are so smart, GO and CHECK the HEADERS of that POST. Was it me? NO IT
WASENT.
You are too smart for yourself.

I am out of this... My last reply.

Best Regards, 
Shazad

 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
jlewis () lewis org
Sent: 13 October 2003 17:29
To: Richard A Steenbergen
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Extreme BlackDiamond


On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

> Is it just me, or could nanog really benefit from being moderated, or at
> least nanog-post being access controlled? God knows why I've kept skimming
> it even after the majority of actual clueful network operators have long

Are you volunteering to be the moderator?  Moderation is alot of work, 
and/or would slow the list down to a crawl.

Perhaps limiting who can post would be somewhat useful though.  Perhaps 
only people actually operating "real networks", where "real networks" are 
somehow defined by their size or their participation in BGP.