nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISPs' willingness to take action
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris () UU NET>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:08:18 +0000 (GMT)
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS wrote:
Brian Bruns asserts that there are lots of home users connecting to their office Exchange servers without VPNs, and that therefore blocking the Microsoft ports was bad. While I agree with his point that you shouldn't do it without documenting what you are or are not blocking, I'm really surprised to hear the assertion that people are leaving unfirewalled Exchange servers out on the net. Is this actually common? /shudders...
apparently so... reference long discussions on nanog regarding blocking welchia/nachi... People even, SHOCKER, use smb shares over the internet without vpns or firewalls :(
Current thread:
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action, (continued)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Bob German (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Eric Kuhnke (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Alan Spicer (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action kenw (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action Bob German (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Matthew Sullivan (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action E.B. Dreger (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 27)
- RE: ISPs' willingness to take action John Ferriby (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action kenw (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Richard Irving (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action William Devine, II (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Brian Bruns (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Brian Bruns (Oct 27)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action matt (Oct 29)
- Re: ISPs' willingness to take action Peter Galbavy (Oct 30)