![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: data request on Sitefinder
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:03:09 -0500
Owen DeLong wrote:
The issues that must be addressed are the issues of internet governance, control of the root (does Verisign serve ICANN or vice-versa), and finally, whether the .com/.net zones belong to the public trust or to Verisign. Focusing on the technical is to fiddle while Rome burns.
This is the part that drives me nuts. Unless a court ordered it otherwise, the root servers can designate ANYONE as the registry for a tld. My understanding is that the process for making such changes is lengthy and involves the agreement of 3 different organizations. However, on a technical level, such changes are possible, and such a registry can form agreements with ICANN and the various registrars.
I'm suddenly reminded of .org... -Jack
Current thread:
- Re[2]: data request on Sitefinder, (continued)
- Re[2]: data request on Sitefinder Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 20)
- Re[3]: data request on Sitefinder Richard Welty (Oct 20)
- Re[3]: data request on Sitefinder Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 20)
- Re[4]: data request on Sitefinder Richard Welty (Oct 20)
- Re: Re[2]: data request on Sitefinder todd glassey (Oct 20)
- Re[4]: data request on Sitefinder Richard Welty (Oct 20)
- Dos attack? Eric Frazier (Oct 20)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Jack Bates (Oct 20)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 21)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Jack Bates (Oct 21)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 21)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 20)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Bruce Campbell (Oct 21)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Kee Hinckley (Oct 20)