nanog mailing list archives
Re: RBLs in use
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 04:55:55 +0800
Kai Schlichting <kai () pac-rim net> writes:
BT have (quite rightly) been repeatedly blocked by DNSBL's and private lists as a result of their poor record in handling abuse incidents (whether that's by intent or negligence by way of a colossal management failure is another debate entirely).
How sure are you, beyond just the usual nan(og|ae) idle chatter? BT is much better off than some ISPs I can think of. I do happen to know they have a few good people in there working for them. If the guy is asking for DNSBLs to use, and you have some good ones in mind, help him, I'd say. --srs -- srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9 manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
Current thread:
- RBLs in use Paul S. Brown (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use todd glassey (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Paul S. Brown (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Chris Lewis (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Paul Vixie (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Paul S. Brown (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Kai Schlichting (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use todd glassey (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use David A. Ulevitch (Nov 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RBLs in use Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Tom (UnitedLayer) (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Matthew Sullivan (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Matthew Sullivan (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Michael Moscovitch (Nov 20)