nanog mailing list archives
Re: RBLs in use
From: "Paul S. Brown" <pol () geekstuff co uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:51:44 +0000
Nope, Just an ISP with normal ISP type operational spam problems. I'm trying to quantify how often we actually appear on RBL, but I want to get some idea of how much credence to give to appearing on any given list. For example something like the old Dorkslayers lists should be ignored because they would blacklist you if you sneezed at the wrong time, however MAPS is probably a good list. P. On Thursday 20 November 2003 3:33 pm, todd glassey wrote:
Does this mean that your employer is a spam operator? T ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul S. Brown" <pol () geekstuff co uk> To: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 7:16 AM Subject: RBLs in useI have been asked to find out what DNSBLs are in use so my employer canseewhat the incidence of its being blacklisted is and how much impact this is likely to have had on their business. What DNSBLs are being used by the various agencies represented on NANOGandhow much weighting do you give them. Are there any DNSBLs you would completely ignore due to data quality issues? Thanks Paul
Current thread:
- RBLs in use Paul S. Brown (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use todd glassey (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Paul S. Brown (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Chris Lewis (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Paul Vixie (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Paul S. Brown (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Kai Schlichting (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use todd glassey (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use David A. Ulevitch (Nov 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RBLs in use Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Tom (UnitedLayer) (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Matthew Sullivan (Nov 20)
- Re: RBLs in use Matthew Sullivan (Nov 20)