nanog mailing list archives
Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement)
From: Tim Wilde <twilde () dyndns org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 01:13:02 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 6 May 2003, John Payne wrote:
I don't know why people keep saying that. I've spoken to UUnet many times on security issues, sometimes as a customer, sometimes not, and every time I've gotten exactly the response I wanted and support above and beyond what I needed. Hell, I even got a lot of support when it was "my friend over here claims to be under attack". Am I lucky, or are others just repeating what they want to hear?
I've had the exact opposite experience when calling UUnet. I was told in no uncertain terms that they WOULD NOT let me speak with ANYONE if I was not a customer, despite 10s of megabits of DDoS coming through their network to mine. Maybe you called the right people, but UUnet's main NOC line certainly had no interest in helping us. And when our upstream who is a UUnet customer called them, they refused to even perform a backtrace without a subpoena in hand for the results of that backtrace. Tim -- Tim Wilde twilde () dyndns org Systems Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/
Current thread:
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement), (continued)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Christopher L. Morrow (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) E.B. Dreger (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Rob Thomas (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Phil Rosenthal (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Scott Granados (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) John Payne (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Rob Thomas (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Scott Granados (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Christopher L. Morrow (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Scott Granados (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Tim Wilde (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Christopher L. Morrow (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Scott Granados (May 07)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Leo Bicknell (May 07)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Christopher L. Morrow (May 07)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Stephen J. Wilcox (May 07)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Christopher L. Morrow (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) David Barak (May 07)
- NOC responses when advised of ongoing DoS attacks (Was Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement)) Niels Bakker (May 07)
- Re: NOC responses when advised of ongoing DoS attacks (Was Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement)) Christopher L. Morrow (May 07)
- Re: NOC responses when advised of ongoing DoS attacks (Was Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement)) David Barak (May 07)