nanog mailing list archives
RE: 69/8 revisited
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett () msmgmt com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:25:20 -0500
look at the location too... 61/8 is APNIC and 69 ARIN.. J
-----Original Message----- From: jlewis () lewis org [mailto:jlewis () lewis org] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 5:02 PM To: Stephen Sprunk Cc: Scott Granados; Rick Ernst; North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes Subject: Re: 69/8 revisited On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Stephen Sprunk wrote:I'm wondering if there's something special about 69/8... Ican't recallthis sort of discussion for 61/8 through 68/8, at leastafter CIDR in theformer Class A space was initially validated.For a very interesting comparison, do groups.google.com searches for 69.0.0.0/8 and then for 61.0.0.0/8. While the first is several pages of hits saying to block 69.0.0.0/8 as a bogon, all the links for 61.0.0.0/8 seem to suggest blocking that /8 due to spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- 69/8 revisited Rick Ernst (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited Scott Granados (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited Stephen Sprunk (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited Scott Granados (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 69/8 revisited McBurnett, Jim (Mar 19)
- 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 28)
- Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited John Palmer (Mar 28)
- Re: Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited Haesu (Mar 28)
- Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited John Palmer (Mar 28)