nanog mailing list archives
Re: 69/8 revisited
From: jlewis () lewis org
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:53:13 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Scott Granados wrote:
I've definitely noticed the steady decline in complaints in reachability. I think though at some point it will be resolved, after all all the other blocks got squared away it seems, or is that an incorrect assumption?
I'd bet they're not all resolved...just mostly to the point that nobody cares. Does anyone have a traceroute web page from another (not 69/8) block that recently went from reserved to RIR allocated? I'd be interesting to see how many of the 69/8 unreachable IPs are unreachable from other reserved->RIR allocated blocks. By the end of the week, I expect to have a system setup (big system with lots of available bandwidth) where people can do simultaneous traceroutes from 69 and !69 IPs and see the results side by side. I've got this now on my workstation and have included a link to it in most of the filter update request messages I've sent, but I don't want all of nanog (much less /.) hitting my workstation. I also plan to put the reachability database on that system and make the unreachable IPs viewable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- 69/8 revisited Rick Ernst (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited Scott Granados (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited Stephen Sprunk (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited Scott Granados (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 69/8 revisited McBurnett, Jim (Mar 19)
- 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 28)
- Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited John Palmer (Mar 28)
- Re: Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited Haesu (Mar 28)
- Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited John Palmer (Mar 28)