nanog mailing list archives
Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24?
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle () darkuncle net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 00:28:37 -0800
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:50:01PM +0000, steve () telecomplete co uk said:
Remember: The majority of the posters here probably have roughly as much (but not as much) of an ego as you, yet a _lot_ more experience and skills to back it up. I think the results areAltho sometime I have to wonder especially with some of the recent posts. Perhaps clueful folk should sneak off and form nanog-clueful mailing list ;)
Please don't; there are many of us lurking who are learning a great deal from listening in on the conversations of the clueful. -- Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net illum oportet crescere me autem minui
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 10)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? alex (Mar 11)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Peter Galbavy (Mar 11)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Scott Francis (Mar 17)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? alex (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? chuck goolsbee (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? alex (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Callis, Adam (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)