nanog mailing list archives
Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24?
From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 07:48:44 -0500 (EST)
Emails to UUnet's NOC are unaswered and the guy I talked to on the phone @ UU wouldn't open a ticket because I'm not a customer (but his traces were dying in the same place as mine: 207.ATM6-0.GW11.NYC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.29.185)) Can anybody out there hit that IP (208.196.93.204) at the moment? Or indeed much of anything in that /8[C:\]ping 208.196.93.204 PING 208.196.93.204: 56 data bytes ----208.196.93.204 PING Statistics---- 7 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss [C:\]tracerte 208.196.93.204 0 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
[skip]
24 * [dies] [C:\]host 208.196.93.204 208.196.93.204 = ecobeauty.org
And we are supposed to take "The Ultimate Diagnosis" from a person who would not think of using tcptrace, telnetting into port 80 or to see if that was an ACL? Phlease. Alex
Current thread:
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 10)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? alex (Mar 11)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Peter Galbavy (Mar 11)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Scott Francis (Mar 17)
- Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? alex (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? chuck goolsbee (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? alex (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Callis, Adam (Mar 11)
- RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)