nanog mailing list archives
Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:42:12 -0500
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:31:08 EST, Jared Mauch said:
When you get a /8, you expect it to be fully usable. The APNIC posture here seems to make sense to me that its an issue that needs to be resolved. using one of the other currently reserved /8's while that issue plays out seems quite logical to me.
I suppose IANA *could* refund 1/2**16'th of the price paid by APNIC.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA John Tran (Mar 16)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Andy Dills (Mar 16)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 16)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Jared Mauch (Mar 16)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 16)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Philip Smith (Mar 16)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Leo Bicknell (Mar 17)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA jlewis (Mar 17)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA bmanning (Mar 17)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Leo Bicknell (Mar 17)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA bdragon (Mar 20)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 20)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA bdragon (Mar 21)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 16)
- Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Andy Dills (Mar 16)
- RE: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Mark Borchers (Mar 17)