nanog mailing list archives
Re: route filtering in large networks
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen () sprunk org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 15:13:08 -0600
Thus spake "Dorian Kim" <dorian () blackrose org>
Route filtering and route validation are not necessarily the same things. AFAIK, there are no scalable mechanisms for route validation deployed today.
A few years ago, I saw an I-D that proposed BGP route repudiation, e.g. you can't be sure a route is _good_, but you can be sure some routes are _bad_. This seems to solve our bogon problem if not the general case. In the meantime, we're still waiting for uRPF implementations that are useful in multihomed networks -- a must-have for widespread deployment. S Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
Current thread:
- Re: route filtering in large networks, (continued)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Rob Thomas (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks E.B. Dreger (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Lars Erik Gullerud (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Alan Hannan (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Stephen Sprunk (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 13)
- IETF BOF on Network Configuration (netconf) Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
- RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Stephen Sprunk (Mar 12)