nanog mailing list archives
Re: route filtering in large networks
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:13:10 -0500
Verio has a history of being a prefix length nazi, but were they that way about route validity?
i can only speak in the quite past tense. but yes. due to limitations of routers (ever try a really long acl on a cisco?) and some large peers not registering, verio could not filter large peers inbound.
Plenty of networks are stringent on what they accept from their customers, but are they as stringent with the routes they send?
if stringent == careful, they <bleep>ing well should be. this does not imply that their inbound business policy must be the same as their outbound, e.g. customers pay to have their routes announced no matter how silly. one's peers are not obliged to listen to them. randy
Current thread:
- Re: route filtering in large networks, (continued)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Rob Thomas (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks E.B. Dreger (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Lars Erik Gullerud (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Alan Hannan (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Stephen Sprunk (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 13)
- IETF BOF on Network Configuration (netconf) Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
- RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Mar 13)