nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies.
From: Andy Walden <andy () tigerteam net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:31:30 -0600 (CST)
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 jlewis () lewis org wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Ron da Silva wrote:Hmm...I would argue that every operator needs to run their own DNSBL.If you only DNSBL IPs after you receive spam from them, you have to get spammed by every IP before it's blocked. Why not reject mail from IPs that have spammed others before they spam you and your customers? Though
I expect this is different in Ron's case since in a single day he gets enough spam to be equivlent to every IP address once. :) So whats an extra day right.. Now if AOL would allow their DNSBL to be mirrored... andy -- PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp
Current thread:
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies., (continued)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. E.B. Dreger (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. J.A. Terranson (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. up (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 11)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Andy Walden (Mar 11)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Ron da Silva (Mar 12)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 12)