nanog mailing list archives
re: rfc1918 ignorant
From: variable () ednet co uk
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:10:17 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Dave Temkin wrote:
Is this really an issue? So long as they're not advertising the space I see no issue with routing traffic through a 10. network as transit. If you have no reason to reach their router directly (and after Cisco's last exploit, I'd think no one would want anyone to reach their router directly :-) ), what's the harm done?
If Frank's seeing the IP in his traceroute then the network concerned isn't properly filtering traffic leaving their borders as per BCP38: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/bcp/bcp38.html Rich
Current thread:
- rfc1918 ignorant Frank Louwers (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant David Lesher (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Vinny Abello (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Haesu (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) (Jul 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- re: rfc1918 ignorant variable (Jul 23)
- source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant) Jared Mauch (Jul 23)
- Re: source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant) variable (Jul 24)
- Re: source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant) Jared Mauch (Jul 24)
- re: rfc1918 ignorant variable (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant David Schwartz (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Lyndon Nerenberg (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Lyndon Nerenberg (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Kevin Oberman (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)