nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco vulnerability on smaller catalyst switches
From: "Petri Helenius" <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:56:13 +0300
My testing with the exploit I initially created has no effect on L2 only catalysts, like 2924XL or so. I havenĀ“t been able to figure out the right sequence if any to accomplish that. No effect even on the management interface. Pete
As part of our vulnerability tests, we have been unable to confirm that the smaller catalyst switches running IOS but without L3 capability are vulnerable. They don't seem to react in a negative way to the same attacks that lock up the other devices we have tested. Has anyone else been able to verify this one way or the other? -- Chris Griffin cgriffin () ufl edu Network Engineer - CCNP Phone: (352) 392-2061 OIT - Network Services Fax: (352) 392-9440 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611
Current thread:
- Cisco vulnerability on smaller catalyst switches Chris Griffin (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco vulnerability on smaller catalyst switches Petri Helenius (Jul 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cisco vulnerability on smaller catalyst switches McBurnett, Jim (Jul 18)
- RE: Cisco vulnerability on smaller catalyst switches Steve Rude (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco vulnerability on smaller catalyst switches Haesu (Jul 18)
- RE: Cisco vulnerability on smaller catalyst switches Steve Rude (Jul 18)