RE: Cisco vulnerability on smaller catalyst switches

["Steve Rude" <steve () skyriver net>]

> > I tested Catalyst 2924-XL-EN with 12.0(5)WC5a and I found that
without
> > L3 capability it does not seem to be affected.  But with L3
> > connectivity, if you direct the attack at the VLAN1 interface it is
> > definitely susceptible. 

> I believe directing the attack to VLAN1 should just kill the remote 
> management and won't effect switching capability. Can anyone confirm?

Ah, you are right.  I just tested it, and the switching through the
catalyst continues without interruption.  Only the management interface
is unavailable.

--steve