nanog mailing list archives
Re: New worm / port 1434?
From: "Adam \"Tauvix\" Debus" <nanog () delsol net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 11:59:15 -0800
I'm betting they are saying that Code Red was worse because anyone who had e-mail could recieve a copy. Only a select number of IP Addresses out there are going to be running MSSQL. Personally, I agree with you, this is much worse the Code Red... Thanks, Adam Debus Network Administrator, ReachONE Internet adam () reachone com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Bates" <jbates () brightok net> To: "Eric Gauthier" <eric () roxanne org>; <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 9:35 AM Subject: Re: New worm / port 1434?
From: "Eric Gauthier"Woot! We made the front page of CNN.com: Electronic attack slows Internet http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/01/25/internet.attack/index.html Guess that USD10 goes to some unnamed reporter at CNNAnd please tell me how CodeRed was worse? I'm sorry, this just created a
lot
of Internet traffic hurting performance? That's a little underrated. But then again, it's a port that could be blocked and not cause severe damage. Block tcp/80 and people would through a fit. *mental note: Block port 80 anytime another port must be blocked just to
be
sure. Jack Bates Network Engineer BrightNet Oklahoma
Current thread:
- Re: New worm / port 1434?, (continued)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Marshall Eubanks (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434?' David G. Andersen (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Marshall Eubanks (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? lost (Jan 25)
- RE: New worm / port 1434? Marcos R. Della (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Eric Gauthier (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Jack Bates (Jan 25)
- RE: New worm / port 1434? Marc Maiffret (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Adam "Tauvix" Debus (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Jack Bates (Jan 25)