nanog mailing list archives
Re: New worm / port 1434?
From: "Jack Bates" <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 11:35:59 -0600
From: "Eric Gauthier"
Woot! We made the front page of CNN.com: Electronic attack slows Internet http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/01/25/internet.attack/index.html Guess that USD10 goes to some unnamed reporter at CNN
And please tell me how CodeRed was worse? I'm sorry, this just created a lot of Internet traffic hurting performance? That's a little underrated. But then again, it's a port that could be blocked and not cause severe damage. Block tcp/80 and people would through a fit. *mental note: Block port 80 anytime another port must be blocked just to be sure. Jack Bates Network Engineer BrightNet Oklahoma
Current thread:
- Re: New worm / port 1434?, (continued)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? lost (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Eric Gauthier (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Marshall Eubanks (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434?' David G. Andersen (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Marshall Eubanks (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? lost (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Eric Gauthier (Jan 25)
- RE: New worm / port 1434? Marcos R. Della (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Eric Gauthier (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Jack Bates (Jan 25)
- RE: New worm / port 1434? Marc Maiffret (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Adam "Tauvix" Debus (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? Jack Bates (Jan 25)
- Re: New worm / port 1434? lost (Jan 25)