nanog mailing list archives
Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () fugawi net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:34:09 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Avi Freedman wrote:
In article <10309.2406.30280 () avi netaxs com> Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
[ SNIP ]
I suppose that the "problem" is likely that people don't understand what a nice actually well-written worm could/would do if it were targeted at the infrastructure.
If any operator doesn't believe it's coming, then I think they can safely be labeled naive. Even then, nothing is for free. -M
Current thread:
- Scaled Back Cybersecuruty sgorman1 (Jan 07)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 08)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Paul Vixie (Jan 08)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Kelly J. Cooper (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Paul Vixie (Jan 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Avi Freedman (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Martin Hannigan (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Paul Vixie (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Andy Dills (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Martin Hannigan (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Bryan Bradsby (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Johannes Ullrich (Jan 14)
- Attacks against Paul Vixie's home network Jeff S Wheeler (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 08)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Sean Donelan (Jan 15)