nanog mailing list archives
Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty
From: Pete Kruckenberg <pete () kruckenberg com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 00:16:01 -0700 (MST)
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 sgorman1 () gmu edu wrote:
This may be of interst: AP: Bush Expected to Sign Scaled Back Internet Security Plan
One of the criticisms of the change relative to this group is that the previous stronger wording for the network operator industry was watered down. Instead of expecting/demanding/mandating that the industry collaborate on network security (creating an ISAC and other measures), the latest draft simply recommends that the industry consider these measures. Is there anything happening with collaborative security policy and remediation in the industry? Has any effort showed progress towards an effective ISAC or similar? Can networks realistically collaborate on security, or do the political and operational barriers not justify the effort? Pete.
Current thread:
- Scaled Back Cybersecuruty sgorman1 (Jan 07)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 08)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Paul Vixie (Jan 08)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Kelly J. Cooper (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Paul Vixie (Jan 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Avi Freedman (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Martin Hannigan (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Paul Vixie (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Andy Dills (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Martin Hannigan (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Bryan Bradsby (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 08)