nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:54:44 -0500
In a message written on Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:12:17PM -0800, David Meyer wrote:
Nope to the former. Someone (6461) is advertising it. We
Speaking for 6461, if a customer asks for a default route, we send them one. The {problem,cool thing} about route-views is many people send it a full table. That can {cause all sorts of analysis problems,give you a view into things you wouldn't normally see}. YMMV. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Routeviews and possible 0/0 route william (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route David Meyer (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Rob Thomas (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Owen DeLong (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route william (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route David Meyer (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Mike Leber (Dec 18)