nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route
From: David Meyer <dmm () 1-4-5 net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:12:17 -0800
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:05:56PM -0800, william () elan net wrote:
I'm seeing the following in RouteViews (possibly since they started getting data from paix): route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp 0.0.0.1 BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 19579757 Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 6939 6461 216.218.252.152 from 216.218.252.152 (216.2t8.252.152) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external 6939 6461 216.218.252.145 from 216.218.252.145 (216.218.252.145) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best Is this routeviews own set default or some other default route improperly appearing in there (weren't routeviews filters supposed to filter out this kind of all-net advertisements)?
Nope to the former. Someone (6461) is advertising it. We haven't traditionally filtered what we receive from our peers. Note also that route views does not use routes from the peers for forwarding traffic. Dave
Current thread:
- Routeviews and possible 0/0 route william (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route David Meyer (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Rob Thomas (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Owen DeLong (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route william (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route David Meyer (Dec 18)
- Re: Routeviews and possible 0/0 route Mike Leber (Dec 18)