nanog mailing list archives
Re: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com]
From: "Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS" <billstewart () att com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:34:24 -0500
I'd say keep it. NANOG's archives at Merit are probably more stable than many mailing list archives I've seen, but it's possible that something will happen to it in the next 5-10 years that kills it. Multiple copies of list archives aren't a bad thing, at least for relatively low volume lists like NANOG. Old archives aren't usually highly useful, but once in a while they can provide good insight into the "why did they do that" sorts of questions. The archive at gmane.org munges @ charactes into " <at> " in an attempt to reduce spider infestations, and it's probably not a bad idea except when people are trying to explain specific syntaxes that this garbles. Bill Stewart.
Current thread:
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection, (continued)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Petri Helenius (Aug 07)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Booth, Michael (ENG) (Aug 07)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Phil Rosenthal (Aug 07)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Geo. (Aug 07)
- Re: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Nathan J. Mehl (Aug 07)
- RE: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Eric Germann (Aug 09)
- RE: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Jay Hennigan (Aug 09)
- RE: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Charles Sprickman (Aug 10)
- Re: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Etaoin Shrdlu (Aug 10)
- Re: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Randy Bush (Aug 10)