Re: Market-based address allocation

[Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>]

Bill Nickless wrote:

> I'm confused--are IPv4 netblocks so valuable that we can't expect the 
> market to set a reasonable price, or are IPv4 netblocks (sets of 
> integers) so worthless that they're not worth the trouble of trading at 
> all?
The issue is that it's just plain smart for large providers to buy all 
the space up if they can. Businesses are into making money. When they 
can, they will monopolize a market.

Most commodities cannot be saturated. You don't buy all the oranges in 
the world and then maintain ownership until the end of the world. The 
next year, everyone will produce more oranges. Even money is 
replenished, and how much is in circulation is governed by the 
corresponding government.

IPv4 address space, while adequate to currently meet our needs, is 
limited. The reason it is adequate is because we do require 
justification. Take away justification and put on a $ value, and the big 
money makers will buy it all, lease it out to people at variable rates, 
and watch the money roll in. Never underestimate greed. It's the 
foundation of business.

-Jack