nanog mailing list archives
Re: Market-based address allocation
From: "David G. Andersen" <dga () lcs mit edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:31:22 -0400
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 02:24:33PM -0700, David Schwartz quacked:
Oh... sorry, are folks really seriously wanting to treat integers as a marketable commodity?Any work that can be produced in digital form has a corresponding integer. Every Disney movie does.
1-800-COLLECT is probably the most pertinent example. www.business.com is a close second. The license plate "UNIX" The source code to Windows -Dave
Current thread:
- Re: Market-based address allocation, (continued)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Bill Nickless (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Jack Bates (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Bill Nickless (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Jack Bates (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Simon Lyall (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation bmanning (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Bill Nickless (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation bmanning (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 30)
- RE: Market-based address allocation David Schwartz (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation David G. Andersen (Apr 30)