nanog mailing list archives

Re: The in-your-face hijacking example, was: Re: Who is announcing bogons?


From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 00:05:04 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)



Back in the day when we had InterNAP transit, I can attest that they were
filtered at _least_ by prefix, by mostly all of the folks who they
acquired transit from.


On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:


On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 05:04:28PM -0500, Jack Bates wrote:

InterNAP. They are large enough that their transits usually don't filter
them, yet they have had several problems in the past with their
customers and not validating the information they've been given. It's
even possible that InterNAP is filtering but took Thorn's word for it.
I'm unfamiliar with 12124's history.

Inap is filtered by almost every one of their transits, both manually and
with IRR entries. In fact, cleaning up all the IRR entry mess created by
proxy registered routes from inap and their transits can be a full time
job.

-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben --
--    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --



Current thread: