nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open relays and open proxies
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:50:29 -0400
--On Friday, April 25, 2003 12:00 PM -0400 Joe Abley <jabley () isc org> wrote:
On Friday, Apr 25, 2003, at 11:57 Canada/Eastern, John Payne wrote:Tired old argument that completely misses the "with the exception of joe jobs" clause.Yes, maybe I'm the only person here who has no idea what that means (in which case a private mail explanation would be fine).
Multiple other people have asked... one line URL response. <http://www.spamfaq.net/terminology.shtml#joe_job>
Current thread:
- Re: Open relays and open proxies, (continued)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Daniel Senie (Apr 25)
- RE: Open relays and open proxies Christopher J. Wolff (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Brian Wallingford (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Joe Abley (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies John Payne (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Joe Abley (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Tim Wilde (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies JC Dill (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies John Payne (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Joe Abley (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Niels Bakker (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Curtis Maurand (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies bdragon (Apr 26)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Curtis Maurand (Apr 27)
- RE: Open relays and open proxies Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Nathan J. Mehl (Apr 30)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Nathan J. Mehl (Apr 30)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Leo Bicknell (Apr 25)