nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T NYC
From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:58:35 -0400 (EDT)
As far as BGP would have done the same thing: would you mind desciring a configuration of BGP where deletion of a network statement in one router would cause unreachability across paths that do not *realy* on that network statement?Since you have replaced ospf/isis/rip or any other dynamic igp with static and connected, apples to apples comparison would be: "Can you describe a configuration where removing 1 static route on 1 router would cause unreachability for other paths?"
Again, this is fully dynamic routing. Alex
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC Petri Helenius (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 02)
- RE: AT&T NYC Frank Scalzo (Sep 03)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- RE: AT&T NYC Feger, James (Sep 03)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC bdragon (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 04)