nanog mailing list archives
Re: PAIX
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:44:43 +0200
Jere Retzer wrote:
Vadim Antonov wrote: >>>People are doing various kinds of video over Internet 1; works fine.<<<Then I must be doing it all wrong because I've never had much luck. Maybe it is a function of the origin and destination location + network. Since Portland is not a top 25 market our service has never been very good -- that's why we started an exchange
The unfortunate development in the video market has been high deployment oftwo applications which do "streaming" without too much regard to how the underlying network works. One sends a high number of fragmented packets and the other is highly
suspectible to retransmission collapse where retransmission requests and retransmissions actually overload the already congested path by a margin.Additionally, the deployment habit of content providers to prefer HTTP instead of RTP/UDP makes monitoring and improving on these services and their performance
quite challenging. Pete
Current thread:
- Re: PAIX, (continued)
- Re: PAIX Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Jere Retzer (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Jere Retzer (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Jere Retzer (Nov 18)
- CogentCo Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 18)
- Re: CogentCo David Schwartz (Nov 18)
- Re: CogentCo Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 18)
- Cogent Results as a CGI Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 19)
- Re: Cogent Results as a CGI Marshall Eubanks (Nov 19)
- Re: Cogent Results as a CGI Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 19)
- CogentCo Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 18)