nanog mailing list archives

Re: Linux routing


From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 07:36:11 -0400 (EDT)


On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:34:47PM -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
I don't really trust the vmstat system time numbers.  Based on some
suggestions I received, I ran some CPU intensive benchmarks during
different traffic loads, and determined how much system time was being
used by comparing the real and user times.  The results seem to show that
if I want to do 50Mbps full-duplex on 2 ports (200M aggregate) that the
standard Linux 2.2.20 routing code won't cut it.
[snip bogus benchmark]

Why are you benchmarking network troughput by bzip2'ing a file in
/tmp? It makes no sense.

interrupts are taking up CPU time, and vmstat is not accurately reporting
it.  I need *something* compute intensive to infer load by seeing how many
cycles are left over.

-Ralph



Current thread: