nanog mailing list archives
Linux routing
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 18:34:47 -0400 (EDT)
I don't really trust the vmstat system time numbers. Based on some suggestions I received, I ran some CPU intensive benchmarks during different traffic loads, and determined how much system time was being used by comparing the real and user times. The results seem to show that if I want to do 50Mbps full-duplex on 2 ports (200M aggregate) that the standard Linux 2.2.20 routing code won't cut it. Unloaded Duron 1G root@TO-VS ~# time bzip2 /tmp/words real 0m0.414s user 0m0.400s sys 0m0.010s 750Mhz Duron, ~20Mbps traffic, 8K int/sec vmstat reported CPU idle: 98% (2% system) root@tor-router ~# time bzip2 /tmp/words real 0m0.628s user 0m0.380s sys 0m0.160s CPU load ~= 40% root@tor-router ~# time bzip2 /tmp/words real 0m0.552s user 0m0.460s sys 0m0.090s CPU load ~=16% 750Mhz Duron, ~60Mbps traffic, 20K int/sec vmstat reported CPU idle: 95% (5% system) root@tor-router ~# time bzip2 /tmp/words real 0m1.071s user 0m0.370s sys 0m0.690s CPU load ~= 65% root@tor-router ~# time bzip2 /tmp/words real 0m1.041s user 0m0.440s sys 0m0.600s CPU load ~= 58%
Current thread:
- Linux routing Ralph Doncaster (May 21)
- Re: Linux routing Peter van Dijk (May 22)
- Re: Linux routing Ralph Doncaster (May 22)
- Re: Linux routing Anthony D Cennami (May 22)
- Re: Linux routing Valdis . Kletnieks (May 22)
- Re: Linux routing Ralph Doncaster (May 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Linux routing Valdis . Kletnieks (May 22)
- Re: Linux routing Peter van Dijk (May 22)