nanog mailing list archives
Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product
From: Pete Kruckenberg <pete () kruckenberg com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 11:56:07 -0600 (MDT)
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
It all depends on the networks involved. I'd venture to say that most people not associated with university networks see significantly less DoS, more like 1% of overall traffic for service providers and probably closer to 0% for end users who aren't IRCing.
Some presentations made at recent NANOGs discussed the continuous noise generated by DDoS attacks, though I can't find any numbers showing how much bandwidth the noise uses. With the number of always-on broadband residential and small-business customers, are education networks still the (only) haven of hackers they used to be? Even enterprises seem to be pretty active DDoS participants; there were/are a lot of corporations generating CodeRed probes, and a surprising number of residential machines. Are there any service providers running IDS/NIDS on their backbones and monitoring for DDoS attacks, to provide some impirical data on the scope of DDoS traffic? Pete.
Current thread:
- Arbor Networks DoS defense product Sean Donelan (May 14)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Pete Kruckenberg (May 14)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Rubens Kuhl Jr. (May 14)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Pete Kruckenberg (May 14)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Richard A Steenbergen (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Pete Kruckenberg (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Rob Thomas (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Dan Hollis (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Rob Thomas (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Dan Hollis (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Rob Thomas (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Dan Hollis (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Rafi Sadowsky (May 15)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Rubens Kuhl Jr. (May 14)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Pete Kruckenberg (May 14)
- Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Rob Thomas (May 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Arbor Networks DoS defense product Cheung, Rick (May 15)