![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP and aggregation
From: PS <pschultz () pschultz com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 06:57:19 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 13 May 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote:
As long as this is getting messy... I'm tempted to suggest confederations. Or spending a few extra bucks on a second ASN, although that doesn't scale.
Multiple ASNs wouldn't solve anything in this case. What was wanted was under normal circumstances both A and B only announce a /20, and when the link between A and B breaks announce more specifics. Multiple ASN = inconsistent AS.. no no. - Paul
Current thread:
- Re: BGP and aggregation, (continued)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen J. Wilcox (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Richard A Steenbergen (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Forrest W. Christian (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen J. Wilcox (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation PS (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation PS (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Austin Schutz (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Forrest W. Christian (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Richard A Steenbergen (May 14)