Re: BGP and aggregation

[Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>]

> > isn't a problem don't worry about it.  If you wish to preserve
> > connectivity between cities you should have a back-up link or use
> > different as's or gre tunnels:).
>
> Floating statics would be a less-hassle means to continue connectivity
> (with only 2 locations not much of a scaling issue).  Or, if you want, a
> default route (learned via BGP if possible) going to your upstream(s).  An
> IBGP session sharing full routing information might not be something you
> want to keep established over a GRE tunnel.

Hmm... the default route idea sounds even easier than my iBGP over a
transit link.  I think I'll try your idea first.

-Ralph