nanog mailing list archives

Re: /31 mask address

From: JAKO Andras <goya () eik bme hu>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 13:35:34 +0200 (MEST)

Has anyone used /31 mask addresses on their network?


Yes, works fine (on an all Cisco network).


Maybe not interesting for an ISP, but I'm using it on a vlan interface on
a 6500/7600. It works fine with IOS 12.1.8-EX5, but 12.1.11-E1 refused the
configuration because it's not a p2p interface. I know, documentation only
talks about p2p, but sometimes I don't like when a "feature" gets fixed...

Andras

Current thread:

Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks?, (continued)
- - Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Eric Gauthier (May 02)
    - Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Stephen Griffin (May 03)
    - Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 03)
    - /31 mask address Toan Do (May 03)
    - Re: /31 mask address Simon Lockhart (May 03)
    - Re: /31 mask address Andre Chapuis (May 03)
    - Re: /31 mask address Simon Lockhart (May 03)
    - Re: /31 mask address Robert E. Seastrom (May 03)
    - Re: /31 mask address Manolo Hernandez (May 03)
    - Re: /31 mask address Andre Chapuis (May 03)
    - Re: /31 mask address JAKO Andras (May 06)
    - Re: /31 mask address Simon Lockhart (May 06)
    - Re: /31 mask address Miguel Mata-Cardona (May 03)
    - Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Stephen Griffin (May 04)
    - Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Christopher L. Morrow (May 04)
    - Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
    - RE: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Barry Raveendran Greene (May 05)
    - unicast RPF for peers viable? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
    - Re: unicast RPF for peers viable? Richard A Steenbergen (May 05)
    - RE: unicast RPF for peers viable? Barry Raveendran Greene (May 05)
    - uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Livio Ricciulli (May 05)

(Thread continues...)